|
Post by swash on Jun 6, 2024 12:05:31 GMT -5
There has been much talk about Sarah being the top player in the class, but I feel like that still leaves a big range between a D, Maya, Stewie, Paige level or say Megan Walker (also a #1). It's hard to get a good read on her. Here, we've had comments that she will be an AA in year one and debates about whether there will be room for her on the floor (though both these extremes were minority opinions)
Clips: When I see the clips, I don't see the "special" coming through, because every top player these days has highlights of their best moments. Sure, Sarah has them too, but what does that really prove?
Evaluators: Her shooting is said to be anywhere from solid to excellent. But people don't seem to know what else to say other than that she does a little of everything. Even Geno's comments the other day ... essentially amount to unspecific platitudes. That's hard to gauge, because it could mean that nothing stands out, or everything does.
Media: Blah blah... no meat here. Nothing that we can hang hats on, anyway. More platitudes. Most of it is just ... winner, ranked #1, best player on the floor... Nothing to sink our teeth into.
Teams: Her HS team is not particularly noteworthy. Without her, we'd likely never have heard of it. She keeps making the USA teams, so she clearly is doing something right.
Game Film: Here is where I finally see something.
Her passing is outstanding. Reminiscent of a certain frosh PoY who often made us wonder how she even knew that opportunity was there?
She "finds herself" at the right location ... way too often for it to be good fortune.
When a teammate is in trouble, she emerges from the crowd to a clear availability.
The decisions are the right ones enough to make it evident that she is considering options in that instant and selecting one over the others.
Her moves are smooth and result in relocation toward options (not just shots).
In other words ... things that are less pizzazz and more effective. Stuff evaluators rarely mention ... the media ... never.
One final nugget: On this team, the four spot is wide open for her. Caroline, Aubrey, and Ayanna are recovering. Paige is needed elsewhere. Most of the time, Jana and Ice will be at Center. Q was exclusively a wing last year, and not strong enough to defend most quality forwards. Morgan? Maybe for stretches, but that's not where she's likely to play a lot of minutes. Further, the guard depth is stellar and opponents will be forced to assign resources all over the three point arc, opening things up for Ms Strong.
What have I missed?
|
|
|
Post by bulkey on Jun 6, 2024 12:14:41 GMT -5
Great, swash!
from the tapes I've seen, Sarah has the skills that you've illuminated so effectively. It's her instincts that really jump out: seemingly effortlessly being at the right place at the right time...and then finishing....
But I also see serious defensive lapses. Maybe in high school she was too valuable to risk fouling. But that now needs to change...and it will....
|
|
BJ42
Purebred Husky
Posts: 458
|
Post by BJ42 on Jun 6, 2024 12:31:39 GMT -5
What I see is that Strong is one of the most efficient offensive players coming out of HS in quite awhile. Elite floor vision and reactions and she instinctively understands how P&P and P&R actions work. No indecision on when to shoot or pass it. Creates space for herself with her bulk and strength inside. Plus she'll be one of the best 3 shooters around. She shoots them like darts, a short, quick snap release with no wasted motion. Very accurate. Very good rebounder and just needs to be adequate on defense and she'll play big minutes.
|
|
|
Post by huskyharper on Jun 6, 2024 12:51:30 GMT -5
While offense is fun and we all love it, there is that old adage "defense wins championships.". Although we really needed more offense in the last couple of years...
|
|
|
Sarah
Jun 6, 2024 14:29:05 GMT -5
swash likes this
Post by meyers7 on Jun 6, 2024 14:29:05 GMT -5
There has been much talk about Sarah being the top player in the class, but I feel like that still leaves a big range between a D, Maya, Stewie, Paige level or say Megan Walker (also a #1). It's hard to get a good read on her. Here, we've had comments that she will be an AA in year one and debates about whether there will be room for her on the floor (though both these extremes were minority opinions) Clips: When I see the clips, I don't see the "special" coming through, because every top player these days has highlights of their best moments. Sure, Sarah has them too, but what does that really prove? Evaluators: Her shooting is said to be anywhere from solid to excellent. But people don't seem to know what else to say other than that she does a little of everything. Even Geno's comments the other day ... essentially amount to unspecific platitudes. That's hard to gauge, because it could mean that nothing stands out, or everything does. Media: Blah blah... no meat here. Nothing that we can hang hats on, anyway. More platitudes. Most of it is just ... winner, ranked #1, best player on the floor... Nothing to sink our teeth into. Teams: Her HS team is not particularly noteworthy. Without her, we'd likely never have heard of it. She keeps making the USA teams, so she clearly is doing something right. Game Film: Here is where I finally see something. Her passing is outstanding. Reminiscent of a certain frosh PoY who often made us wonder how she even knew that opportunity was there? She "finds herself" at the right location ... way too often for it to be good fortune. When a teammate is in trouble, she emerges from the crowd to a clear availability. The decisions are the right ones enough to make it evident that she is considering options in that instant and selecting one over the others. Her moves are smooth and result in relocation toward options (not just shots). In other words ... things that are less pizzazz and more effective. Stuff evaluators rarely mention ... the media ... never. One final nugget: On this team, the four spot is wide open for her. Caroline, Aubrey, and Ayanna are recovering. Paige is needed elsewhere. Most of the time, Jana and Ice will be at Center. Q was exclusively a wing last year, and not strong enough to defend most quality forwards. Morgan? Maybe for stretches, but that's not where she's likely to play a lot of minutes. Further, the guard depth is stellar and opponents will be forced to assign resources all over the three point arc, opening things up for Ms Strong. What have I missed? Well Strong is NOT the consensus #1. Prospect Nation and Hoopgurlz (ESPN) had her #1. However ASGR had her #2 and Bluestar had her at #9. So that's different from some of the players who came in here as everybody's #1. Actually if you combine the Ranking services (which is what I do), Strong is #3 behind Edwards and Cambridge. Zeibell comes in at #6 overall and Cheli comes in at #10 overall. So still a fantastic class, 3 "combined ratings" top 10. (which in my book is the best class) I agree with your "less pizzaz, more effective". Or so it seems. She might be one of those "quietly puts up numbers" type of player.
|
|
|
Post by linkster on Jun 6, 2024 17:21:54 GMT -5
There has been much talk about Sarah being the top player in the class, but I feel like that still leaves a big range between a D, Maya, Stewie, Paige level or say Megan Walker (also a #1). It's hard to get a good read on her. Here, we've had comments that she will be an AA in year one and debates about whether there will be room for her on the floor (though both these extremes were minority opinions) Clips: When I see the clips, I don't see the "special" coming through, because every top player these days has highlights of their best moments. Sure, Sarah has them too, but what does that really prove? Evaluators: Her shooting is said to be anywhere from solid to excellent. But people don't seem to know what else to say other than that she does a little of everything. Even Geno's comments the other day ... essentially amount to unspecific platitudes. That's hard to gauge, because it could mean that nothing stands out, or everything does. Media: Blah blah... no meat here. Nothing that we can hang hats on, anyway. More platitudes. Most of it is just ... winner, ranked #1, best player on the floor... Nothing to sink our teeth into. Teams: Her HS team is not particularly noteworthy. Without her, we'd likely never have heard of it. She keeps making the USA teams, so she clearly is doing something right. Game Film: Here is where I finally see something. Her passing is outstanding. Reminiscent of a certain frosh PoY who often made us wonder how she even knew that opportunity was there? She "finds herself" at the right location ... way too often for it to be good fortune. When a teammate is in trouble, she emerges from the crowd to a clear availability. The decisions are the right ones enough to make it evident that she is considering options in that instant and selecting one over the others. Her moves are smooth and result in relocation toward options (not just shots). In other words ... things that are less pizzazz and more effective. Stuff evaluators rarely mention ... the media ... never. One final nugget: On this team, the four spot is wide open for her. Caroline, Aubrey, and Ayanna are recovering. Paige is needed elsewhere. Most of the time, Jana and Ice will be at Center. Q was exclusively a wing last year, and not strong enough to defend most quality forwards. Morgan? Maybe for stretches, but that's not where she's likely to play a lot of minutes. Further, the guard depth is stellar and opponents will be forced to assign resources all over the three point arc, opening things up for Ms Strong. What have I missed? Well Strong is NOT the consensus #1. Prospect Nation and Hoopgurlz (ESPN) had her #1. However ASGR had her #2 and Bluestar had her at #9. So that's different from some of the players who came in here as everybody's #1. Actually if you combine the Ranking services (which is what I do), Strong is #3 behind Edwards and Cambridge. Zeibell comes in at #6 overall and Cheli comes in at #10 overall. So still a fantastic class, 3 "combined ratings" top 10. (which in my book is the best class) I agree with your "less pizzaz, more effective". Or so it seems. She might be one of those "quietly puts up numbers" type of player. Is a simple arithmetic average the best method? I four services rate a player 1,1,2,12 the player's mean is 4, her median is 1 or 2 and her modal ranking is 1. Another way is to throw out the high and low which makes her either 1 or 2. (I used 12 instead of 9 for an easier calculation).
|
|
|
Sarah
Jun 6, 2024 17:40:09 GMT -5
Post by linkster on Jun 6, 2024 17:40:09 GMT -5
There has been much talk about Sarah being the top player in the class, but I feel like that still leaves a big range between a D, Maya, Stewie, Paige level or say Megan Walker (also a #1). It's hard to get a good read on her. Here, we've had comments that she will be an AA in year one and debates about whether there will be room for her on the floor (though both these extremes were minority opinions) Clips: When I see the clips, I don't see the "special" coming through, because every top player these days has highlights of their best moments. Sure, Sarah has them too, but what does that really prove? Evaluators: Her shooting is said to be anywhere from solid to excellent. But people don't seem to know what else to say other than that she does a little of everything. Even Geno's comments the other day ... essentially amount to unspecific platitudes. That's hard to gauge, because it could mean that nothing stands out, or everything does. Media: More platitudes. Blah blah... no meat here. Nothing that we can hang hats on, anyway. Most of it is just ... winner, ranked #1, best player on the floor... Nothing to sink our teeth into. Teams: Her HS team is not particularly noteworthy. Without her, we'd likely never have heard of it. She keeps making the USA teams, so she clearly is doing something right. Game Film: Here is where I finally see something. Her passing is outstanding. Reminiscent of a certain frosh PoY who often made us wonder how she even knew that opportunity was there? She "finds herself" at the right location ... way too often for it to be good fortune. When a teammate is in trouble, she emerges from the crowd to a clear availability. The decisions are the right ones enough to make it evident that she is considering options in that instant and selecting one over the others. Her moves are smooth and result in relocation toward options (not just shots). In other words ... things that are less pizzazz and more effective. Stuff evaluators rarely mention ... the media ... never. One final nugget: On this team, the four spot is wide open for her. Caroline, Aubrey, and Ayanna are recovering. Paige is needed elsewhere. Most of the time, Jana and Ice will be at Center. Q was exclusively a wing last year, and not strong enough to defend most quality forwards. Morgan? Maybe for stretches, but that's not where she's likely to play a lot of minutes. Further, the guard depth is stellar and opponents will be forced to assign resources all over the three point arc, opening things up for Ms Strong. What have I missed? My reading of your opinion of the media is basically my opinion of your entire post. "Blah blah... no meat here. Nothing that we can hang hats on, anyway."
Lots of opinion but little meat to support those opinions. Go back and watch the 2021 team play. ONO, Juhasz and Edwards rotated and it was impossible to distinguish 4's and 5's. I'm very high on Strong and think she is the next dominant player for UConn. I also don't think Brady is any more of a center than Strong nor do I think that a 6'6 player is automatically slotted at the 5. Frankly I don't think UConn has a center nor do they need one. I prefer more versatile big players. (Unless Geno finds a 7' giant with limited mobility and a sky hook.)
|
|
|
Post by ucchamp on Jun 6, 2024 19:45:26 GMT -5
There has been much talk about Sarah being the top player in the class, but I feel like that still leaves a big range between a D, Maya, Stewie, Paige level or say Megan Walker (also a #1). It's hard to get a good read on her. Here, we've had comments that she will be an AA in year one and debates about whether there will be room for her on the floor (though both these extremes were minority opinions) Clips: When I see the clips, I don't see the "special" coming through, because every top player these days has highlights of their best moments. Sure, Sarah has them too, but what does that really prove? Evaluators: Her shooting is said to be anywhere from solid to excellent. But people don't seem to know what else to say other than that she does a little of everything. Even Geno's comments the other day ... essentially amount to unspecific platitudes. That's hard to gauge, because it could mean that nothing stands out, or everything does. Media: Blah blah... no meat here. Nothing that we can hang hats on, anyway. More platitudes. Most of it is just ... winner, ranked #1, best player on the floor... Nothing to sink our teeth into. Teams: Her HS team is not particularly noteworthy. Without her, we'd likely never have heard of it. She keeps making the USA teams, so she clearly is doing something right. Game Film: Here is where I finally see something. Her passing is outstanding. Reminiscent of a certain frosh PoY who often made us wonder how she even knew that opportunity was there? She "finds herself" at the right location ... way too often for it to be good fortune. When a teammate is in trouble, she emerges from the crowd to a clear availability. The decisions are the right ones enough to make it evident that she is considering options in that instant and selecting one over the others. Her moves are smooth and result in relocation toward options (not just shots). In other words ... things that are less pizzazz and more effective. Stuff evaluators rarely mention ... the media ... never. One final nugget: On this team, the four spot is wide open for her. Caroline, Aubrey, and Ayanna are recovering. Paige is needed elsewhere. Most of the time, Jana and Ice will be at Center. Q was exclusively a wing last year, and not strong enough to defend most quality forwards. Morgan? Maybe for stretches, but that's not where she's likely to play a lot of minutes. Further, the guard depth is stellar and opponents will be forced to assign resources all over the three point arc, opening things up for Ms Strong. What have I missed? Well Strong is NOT the consensus #1. Prospect Nation and Hoopgurlz (ESPN) had her #1. However ASGR had her #2 and Bluestar had her at #9. So that's different from some of the players who came in here as everybody's #1. Actually if you combine the Ranking services (which is what I do), Strong is #3 behind Edwards and Cambridge. Zeibell comes in at #6 overall and Cheli comes in at #10 overall. So still a fantastic class, 3 "combined ratings" top 10. (which in my book is the best class) I agree with your "less pizzaz, more effective". Or so it seems. She might be one of those "quietly puts up numbers" type of player. In one service years ago one service (not the ones you mentioned) had Saniya Chong as #1. Hasn't there been issues at one time with UCONN and Bluestar? Or that Bluestar favors players that play in their tournaments? IMO no question Sarah is going to be tremendous. While using HoopGurlz - there have been #1's that either have struggled their frosh year or have not been super. I think the chance Sarah falls into these categories (if she remains healthy) is slim-to-none. She seems to be too efficient. Already saw what she did head-to-head vs Edwards. Already saw what she did vs the 30th ranked player a 6'6 center. All the write-ups about her nail exactly what she did vs both players. As did the McD game 1st half that I saw (missed the 2nd half). In her h/s games the 2 I saw highlights, the funny thing is one game she drilled 3's vs the smaller Edwards yet the other vid showed she destroyed the 6'6 NC recruit in the paint (ie.an incredibly well-rounded game in which she produced vs top competition.). Then low post move I saw as a highlight that Sarah did vs Edwards - she buried her so easily in the paint in which initially Edwards had pretty good position, yet Sarah buried her inside easily. I'm very skeptical of Bluestar. Three of the 4 have her ranked 1/2. I lean toward Bluestar hadn't updated their rankings or the H/S Evaluator is probably way off base. It's not like one gave Sarah 5 then nother 4. With only 4 service, one scouts mis-evaluation can greatly affect the numbers.
|
|
|
Post by bulkey on Jun 6, 2024 19:56:33 GMT -5
Already saw what she did head-to-head vs Edwards. Already saw what she did vs the 30th ranked player a 6'6 center. All the write-ups about her nail exactly what she did vs both players. As did the McD game 1st half that I saw (missed the 2nd half). In her h/s games the 2 I saw highlights, the funny thing is one game she drilled 3's vs the smaller Edwards yet the other vid showed she destroyed the 6'6 NC recruit in the paint (ie.an incredibly well-rounded game in which she produced vs top competition.). Then low post move I saw as a highlight that Sarah did vs Edwards - she buried her so easily in the paint in which initially Edwards had pretty good position, yet Sarah buried her inside easily.
What! You're basing your argument on the actual facts? Is that permitted?
|
|
|
Post by doggydaddy on Jun 6, 2024 21:10:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by meyers7 on Jun 7, 2024 7:22:36 GMT -5
Well Strong is NOT the consensus #1. Prospect Nation and Hoopgurlz (ESPN) had her #1. However ASGR had her #2 and Bluestar had her at #9. So that's different from some of the players who came in here as everybody's #1. Actually if you combine the Ranking services (which is what I do), Strong is #3 behind Edwards and Cambridge. Zeibell comes in at #6 overall and Cheli comes in at #10 overall. So still a fantastic class, 3 "combined ratings" top 10. (which in my book is the best class) I agree with your "less pizzaz, more effective". Or so it seems. She might be one of those "quietly puts up numbers" type of player. Is a simple arithmetic average the best method? I four services rate a player 1,1,2,12 the player's mean is 4, her median is 1 or 2 and her modal ranking is 1. Another way is to throw out the high and low which makes her either 1 or 2. (I used 12 instead of 9 for an easier calculation). Ummm, well probably not, BUT, one would have to figure out an evaluation percentage for each one. (how much each one is worth - there's a word I can't think of??). Which in itself would be subjective. Soooo, for the most part simple math is good enough. Besides, each ranking in itself is subjective and sometimes not overly accurate. e.g. Bluestar didn't update much this year. For instance, last year Watkins and Williams split the #1s. No consensus. And players like Booker, Fulwiley and Hildago were "combined" #8, #10 and #11 respectively. So you know.... The point was, there have been years where the #1 was consensus across the board. Though it actually doesn't seem to happen that often. And this wasn't one of those years.
|
|
|
Sarah
Jun 7, 2024 8:34:16 GMT -5
Post by magic on Jun 7, 2024 8:34:16 GMT -5
The fact is that she looks like a 6'2 guard to me. I'm sure she has inside skills , but I'll wait to see how she assimillates into the Uconn system. There are alot of question marks. I'm interested in how her physical conditioning is right from the start. Other than Paige playing the point, I have an open mind regarding everyone else. That's why Geno gets paid the big bucks !
|
|
|
Post by grrrrr on Jun 7, 2024 8:35:58 GMT -5
Bottom line for all three true freshmen, the tougher the competition the better they play.
|
|
|
Post by ucchamp on Jun 7, 2024 10:44:48 GMT -5
The fact is that she looks like a 6'2 guard to me. I'm sure she has inside skills , but I'll wait to see how she assimillates into the Uconn system. There are alot of question marks. I'm interested in how her physical conditioning is right from the start. Other than Paige playing the point, I have an open mind regarding everyone else. That's why Geno gets paid the big bucks ! This is what makes her so special. She gets 30 pts and 20 rebounds vs the 6'6 Blanca Thomas yet she has terrific guard skills too. She's like Aaliyah - built like brick house. Thus she can get off her shot on teh inside. Then look at teh 3:09 mark teh move she puts on Thomas- even the quick feet. In College they probably call a foul on Thomas too. And notice whenever anyone bumps her on the inside -- her shot is not affected. Many times you see bigs if they get bumped there shot goes off. SHe is just so naturally strong and her build highlights how difficult she would be to handle in the paint.
|
|
|
Post by doggydaddy on Jun 7, 2024 13:01:38 GMT -5
The fact is that she looks like a 6'2 guard to me. I'm sure she has inside skills , but I'll wait to see how she assimillates into the Uconn system. There are alot of question marks. I'm interested in how her physical conditioning is right from the start. Other than Paige playing the point, I have an open mind regarding everyone else. That's why Geno gets paid the big bucks ! This is what makes her so special. She gets 30 pts and 20 rebounds vs the 6'6 Blanca Thomas yet she has terrific guard skills too. She's like Aaliyah - built like brick house. Thus she can get off her shot on teh inside. Then look at teh 3:09 mark teh move she puts on Thomas- even the quick feet. In College they probably call a foul on Thomas too. And notice whenever anyone bumps her on the inside -- her shot is not affected. Many times you see bigs if they get bumped there shot goes off. SHe is just so naturally strong and her build highlights how difficult she would be to handle in the paint. Anyone that questions her talent didn't watch this video.
|
|
|
Sarah
Jun 7, 2024 14:07:45 GMT -5
Post by magic on Jun 7, 2024 14:07:45 GMT -5
I think she's very talented. I'm just not sure " where " on the court she fits. If I had a guess today from what I've seen, I'd pencil her in at the 3/SF position more than the 4/PF. I'm interested in her ball handling skills. We already know she can pass.
|
|
|
Post by ucchamp on Jun 7, 2024 14:18:36 GMT -5
I think she's very talented. I'm just not sure " where " on the court she fits. If I had a guess today from what I've seen, I'd pencil her in at the 3/SF position more than the 4/PF. I'm interested in her ball handling skills. We already know she can pass. Why not the pf on Defense when she's known as an elite rebounder? And use her passing skils to pass the ball to superior perimter scorers that are available at the 1-3 spots? That would enhance her passing productivity, wouldn't it?
|
|
|
Post by linkster on Jun 7, 2024 23:32:59 GMT -5
The fact is that she looks like a 6'2 guard to me. I'm sure she has inside skills , but I'll wait to see how she assimillates into the Uconn system. There are alot of question marks. I'm interested in how her physical conditioning is right from the start. Other than Paige playing the point, I have an open mind regarding everyone else. That's why Geno gets paid the big bucks ! On a video Strong admitted that the first team workout was tough but she got through it. The only way I could see a UConn recruit coming in out of shape is if they were injured. Virtually all the players coming to UConn lately are all highly self-motivated.
|
|
|
Sarah
Jun 8, 2024 10:31:07 GMT -5
Post by magic on Jun 8, 2024 10:31:07 GMT -5
I think she's very talented. I'm just not sure " where " on the court she fits. If I had a guess today from what I've seen, I'd pencil her in at the 3/SF position more than the 4/PF. I'm interested in her ball handling skills. We already know she can pass. Why not the pf on Defense when she's known as an elite rebounder? And use her passing skils to pass the ball to superior perimter scorers that are available at the 1-3 spots? That would enhance her passing productivity, wouldn't it? I'm sure she is a great passer and and in Uconn's system that is a must. But, I want scorers to score. If Paige is back at point, I hardly think the team needs a point forward. I want Paige surrounded by shooters and rebounders that can also pass. As I said my mind is wide open.
|
|
|
Post by connboy77 on Jun 8, 2024 10:41:30 GMT -5
I am very excited by this team and can't wait for the season to start. Maybe I'm a little too optimistic but I feel that if UCONJN stays healthy through the season I don't see any team beating them. NC # 12 is a reality.
|
|
|
Post by radylady on Jun 8, 2024 10:53:04 GMT -5
There has been much talk about Sarah being the top player in the class, but I feel like that still leaves a big range between a D, Maya, Stewie, Paige level or say Megan Walker (also a #1). It's hard to get a good read on her. Here, we've had comments that she will be an AA in year one and debates about whether there will be room for her on the floor (though both these extremes were minority opinions) Clips: When I see the clips, I don't see the "special" coming through, because every top player these days has highlights of their best moments. Sure, Sarah has them too, but what does that really prove? Evaluators: Her shooting is said to be anywhere from solid to excellent. But people don't seem to know what else to say other than that she does a little of everything. Even Geno's comments the other day ... essentially amount to unspecific platitudes. That's hard to gauge, because it could mean that nothing stands out, or everything does. Media: Blah blah... no meat here. Nothing that we can hang hats on, anyway. More platitudes. Most of it is just ... winner, ranked #1, best player on the floor... Nothing to sink our teeth into. Teams: Her HS team is not particularly noteworthy. Without her, we'd likely never have heard of it. She keeps making the USA teams, so she clearly is doing something right. Game Film: Here is where I finally see something. Her passing is outstanding. Reminiscent of a certain frosh PoY who often made us wonder how she even knew that opportunity was there? She "finds herself" at the right location ... way too often for it to be good fortune. When a teammate is in trouble, she emerges from the crowd to a clear availability. The decisions are the right ones enough to make it evident that she is considering options in that instant and selecting one over the others. Her moves are smooth and result in relocation toward options (not just shots). In other words ... things that are less pizzazz and more effective. Stuff evaluators rarely mention ... the media ... never. One final nugget: On this team, the four spot is wide open for her. Caroline, Aubrey, and Ayanna are recovering. Paige is needed elsewhere. Most of the time, Jana and Ice will be at Center. Q was exclusively a wing last year, and not strong enough to defend most quality forwards. Morgan? Maybe for stretches, but that's not where she's likely to play a lot of minutes. Further, the guard depth is stellar and opponents will be forced to assign resources all over the three point arc, opening things up for Ms Strong. What have I missed? excellent post. I have only seen a little of her work, so I yield to your observations
|
|
|
Post by radylady on Jun 8, 2024 10:55:32 GMT -5
The fact is that she looks like a 6'2 guard to me. I'm sure she has inside skills , but I'll wait to see how she assimillates into the Uconn system. There are alot of question marks. I'm interested in how her physical conditioning is right from the start. Other than Paige playing the point, I have an open mind regarding everyone else. That's why Geno gets paid the big bucks ! On a video Strong admitted that the first team workout was tough but she got through it. The only way I could see a UConn recruit coming in out of shape is if they were injured. Virtually all the players coming to UConn lately are all highly self-motivated. I don't believe that this is surprising. She will either step up to the challenge or falter. Only two choices. And the team workouts are brutal from all told - I believe it's akin to bootcamp. if she has the drive, she will come along and excel.
|
|
|
Sarah
Jun 8, 2024 12:21:53 GMT -5
Post by linkster on Jun 8, 2024 12:21:53 GMT -5
I think she's very talented. I'm just not sure " where " on the court she fits. If I had a guess today from what I've seen, I'd pencil her in at the 3/SF position more than the 4/PF. I'm interested in her ball handling skills. We already know she can pass. Why not the pf on Defense when she's known as an elite rebounder? And use her passing skils to pass the ball to superior perimter scorers that are available at the 1-3 spots? That would enhance her passing productivity, wouldn't it? It's very likely that she is already a superior perimeter scorer herself. Just from the numbers I'd say she is a better 3pt shooter than either Shade or Arnold were last season. Even better than Samuels. I wouldn't be surprised if she was in the 3pt contest at 1st Night against Bueckers Fudd and Ziebell. This is the sort of problem Geno prefers.
|
|
|
Post by rockymtblue2 on Jun 8, 2024 13:45:08 GMT -5
Why not the pf on Defense when she's known as an elite rebounder? And use her passing skils to pass the ball to superior perimter scorers that are available at the 1-3 spots? That would enhance her passing productivity, wouldn't it? It's very likely that she is already a superior perimeter scorer herself. Just from the numbers I'd say she is a better 3pt shooter than either Shade or Arnold were last season. Even better than Samuels. I wouldn't be surprised if she was in the 3pt contest at 1st Night against Bueckers Fudd and Ziebell. This is the sort of problem Geno prefers. Your 3 point percentage in HS may be a substantially different cat than your percentage in DI basketball. Geno didn't bring her here to hang out in logo land, though 3s to drag the other team's big out are a time tested strategy.
|
|
|
Post by linkster on Jun 8, 2024 14:06:44 GMT -5
It's very likely that she is already a superior perimeter scorer herself. Just from the numbers I'd say she is a better 3pt shooter than either Shade or Arnold were last season. Even better than Samuels. I wouldn't be surprised if she was in the 3pt contest at 1st Night against Bueckers Fudd and Ziebell. This is the sort of problem Geno prefers. Your 3 point percentage in HS may be a substantially different cat than your percentage in DI basketball. Geno didn't bring her here to hang out in logo land, though 3s to drag the other team's big out are a time tested strategy. I agree about the difference between HS and college but I wasn't talking about logo 3's. My imagination has her playing a high post where her reported passing skills would blend with her powerful drives to the hoop and her step back 3's and turn her into a 3-headed Husky.
|
|