|
Post by doggydaddy on Jan 16, 2021 22:06:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by semper on Jan 17, 2021 6:27:14 GMT -5
Great report. So interesting how many ways COVID has of taking its toll. Teams are rusty from not playing; some players can't play because of testing results being delayed; coaches miss games and practices. Makes for an aura of unpredictability day by day. I am glad that players get another year because this one is full of holes, all the time. Geno said every game is like our first game. You can't get anything going.
|
|
|
Post by swash on Jan 17, 2021 6:50:23 GMT -5
Great report. So interesting how many ways COVID has of taking its toll. Teams are rusty from not playing; some players can't play because of testing results being delayed; coaches miss games and practices. Makes for an aura of unpredictability day by day. I am glad that players get another year because this one is full of holes, all the time. Geno said every game is like our first game. You can't get anything going. Yeah, remember the worry about playing five games in ten days? We'd all probably sign up for that again, right now. I'm betting the players and coaches would agree
|
|
|
Post by UConnChapette on Jan 17, 2021 8:55:17 GMT -5
Woot woot! I got a mention! I will enjoy my 15 minutes of pseudo fame with my coffee.
I will also enjoy my second home state team the Bug Eaters (or Huskers) win over Ohio State. Oh, let’s not forget the Iowa State win over Baylor. It doesn’t matter to me that the Bears were down two players. Any Baylor loss is a good loss!
Coffee is tasting mighty fine this morning.
|
|
|
Post by phil on Jan 17, 2021 9:18:33 GMT -5
Nice write up of the Iowa State upset of Baylor. I kept thinking that there was going to say "enough of this nonsense", go on a run to take a big lead and not look back but it never happened.
I don't usually like to dump on the commentators, but there was one government that left me astounded. No, I'm not talking about the time the announcer said that Baylor took a timeout, and after the timeout was going to advance the ball to the other end. The other announcer said nothing, the first announcer repeated herself explaining that Baylor was going to advance the ball after the timeout and the other announcer had to point out that it was Iowa State ball (interestingly, they did not advance the ball). That's the type of error that I could see myself making in the context of live-action and not fully keeping track of everything. No, that one I thought was funny, not astounding.
The comment that surprised me was when the announcer explained, with eight minutes left in the game, that Iowa State to start taking time off the clock running the shot clock down closer to the end. Now I happen to be a fan of this approach, and probably advocated more than I should, but I could justify advising this with eight minutes left if you had a 15 point lead. If you had a 10 point lead I might support it but I can understand that many would not. However, Iowa State had a two-point lead, with eight minutes left in the announcer was advising changing their regular game plan to a slowdown game at that point. You know what can happen? You fail the score they take it back down the court and score and you have a tie game. And that's what happened, seconds after she gave that advice. I don't know what she was thinking.
|
|
|
Post by phil on Jan 17, 2021 9:25:57 GMT -5
Puzzling season for Nebraska. (Theme for this season?)
They lost to Creighton and Purdue, but beat Rutgers and Michigan State, the latter two, being much better than Creighton and Purdue.
A loss to Indiana was understandable, but not the score 81 – 45.
The two point loss to ranked Michigan was understandable.
Normally, the wins over Northwestern and Ohio State would be enough to get them into the rankings, but those pesky losses will hurt.
|
|
|
Post by phil on Jan 17, 2021 9:33:53 GMT -5
Cal's chances at getting your when the season are looking slimmer and slimmer. Doggydaddy reported that the game against Utah has been postponed due to Covid issues. While Cal is a double-digit underdog to Utah, that's the weakest of the remaining opponents, and barring some miracle, an upset of Utah is about their only shot at winning a game this season.
|
|
|
Post by swash on Jan 17, 2021 10:20:58 GMT -5
Nice write up of the Iowa State upset of Baylor. I kept thinking that there was going to say "enough of this nonsense", go on a run to take a big lead and not look back but it never happened. I don't usually like to dump on the commentators, but there was one government that left me astounded. No, I'm not talking about the time the announcer said that Baylor took a timeout, and after the timeout was going to advance the ball to the other end. The other announcer said nothing, the first announcer repeated herself explaining that Baylor was going to advance the ball after the timeout and the other announcer had to point out that it was Iowa State ball (interestingly, they did not advance the ball). That's the type of error that I could see myself making in the context of live-action and not fully keeping track of everything. No, that one I thought was funny, not astounding. The comment that surprised me was when the announcer explained, with eight minutes left in the game, that Iowa State to start taking time off the clock running the shot clock down closer to the end. Now I happen to be a fan of this approach, and probably advocated more than I should, but I could justify advising this with eight minutes left if you had a 15 point lead. If you had a 10 point lead I might support it but I can understand that many would not. However, Iowa State had a two-point lead, with eight minutes left in the announcer was advising changing their regular game plan to a slowdown game at that point. You know what can happen? You fail the score they take it back down the court and score and you have a tie game. And that's what happened, seconds after she gave that advice. I don't know what she was thinking. Boneheaded statement. I suspect they get into a routine and just say things that are sometimes Pearl's of group-think, and throw them in when they don't know what to say and recognize that they need to say something. Thus there's less thought about whether that one fits now. As to advancing the ball, that's a fairly new rule and has some twists. ...can advance on a timeout [only] after a made basket in the last two minutes. So, if the other team took a TO, or other things happened... but no time advanced before the TO, ... then the scenario is more confusing. Any time ticks, though and I think the opportunity is gone. If the team that just scored fouls without reaching the bonus before the ball enters play, I think the opportunity is still intact. I give them a little more slack there, but not much. The announcers should know the rules. Period. BTW- A peeve of mine ... It should always be a technical with shots and a new possession for a foul before the ball is released to come into play. The way it works today, the rules encourage that fowl foul before the ball comes in. Any infraction not part of the running time should be a T.
|
|
|
Post by swash on Jan 17, 2021 10:57:32 GMT -5
Here's a thought. We need a bubble with several teams to get all the possible NCAA qualifiers up to 13 games, then a bubble for each conference tournament, then a bubble for the big dance.
Gather the teams who are not out of the running in up to three sites of 32 schools apiece. Bubble, quarantine, and test for ten days. Then play round robin 8 to 10 games with 2 or 3 days between.
Wait at least week, then give conferences time to do the same for their tournaments
Schedule a gap for more quarantining, during which the selection committee does their thing, then bubble two regions (32 teams) each at two nearby sites. Winners of those two sites play for all the marbles.
This way minimizes the costs, maximizes the safety for the players and coaches, makes it possible to sell the media block, and ensures that every worthy team has the chance to prove it on the court. ... but there's not much time left to pull this off. Roughly a month for the first wave, a couple of weeks for the conferences gets us to March madness roughly on time.
|
|
|
Post by rockymtblue2 on Jan 17, 2021 11:01:44 GMT -5
Very nice report DD.
|
|
|
Post by chicagogg on Jan 17, 2021 15:52:44 GMT -5
Another very good day of DD! Yay!
David - that was RIGHT ON!!!
|
|
|
Post by phil on Jan 17, 2021 16:24:56 GMT -5
can advance on a timeout [only] after a made basket in the last two minutes. Interesting, I did not realize that.
|
|
|
Post by grrrrr on Jan 18, 2021 11:23:31 GMT -5
Great job DD, but reading the report does have unanticipated dangers. I am so glad I finished my doughnut BEFORE I started reading, cause if I came across the line "One, the number after 0 but before 2" with my mouthful two things could have happened. One, my keyboard would have been wearing it, or, and this may be worse, I could have choked to death. Still laughing, thanks again. PS That stat may explain the departure.
|
|
|
Post by bertieboy on Jan 18, 2021 11:37:37 GMT -5
A nice write up by DogDaddy except for his criticism of Andra Espinoza-Hunter. That was totally out of order and should not have been done. Nor should it be done for anyone else in the future.
|
|
|
Post by chicagogg on Jan 18, 2021 12:09:00 GMT -5
A nice write up by DogDaddy except for his criticism of Andra Espinoza-Hunter. That was totally out of order and should not have been done. Nor should it be done for anyone else in the future. Have to disagree with you here. Both DD and David have made valid analyses of her playing style. That's fair.
|
|
|
Post by swash on Jan 18, 2021 12:41:46 GMT -5
A nice write up by DogDaddy except for his criticism of Andra Espinoza-Hunter. That was totally out of order and should not have been done. Nor should it be done for anyone else in the future. Is it player criticism in general you dislike or that directed toward departed players or this particular individual? Lots of positive notes about AEH have been posted here as well. Seems valid to point out notable statistics, both when they look good and otherwise. The bit in the Stanford write up was a bit of a drive by, but he's referencing a recent piece with humorous intent.
|
|
|
Post by semper on Jan 18, 2021 13:07:05 GMT -5
Hey Bertie Boy, glad you are here, but we really try to keep it light. Makes for a better discussion.
|
|
|
Post by doggydaddy on Jan 18, 2021 16:31:39 GMT -5
A nice write up by DogDaddy except for his criticism of Andra Espinoza-Hunter. That was totally out of order and should not have been done. Nor should it be done for anyone else in the future. It's a blog, write your own if you don't like it. I didn't post anything that wasn't true.
|
|
|
Post by davidinnaples on Jan 18, 2021 17:55:54 GMT -5
Let’s give blame/credit to the right person. I wrote the Stats Don’t Lie piece on AEH. Doggy doesn’t edit anything I write unless it is typo or punctuation issue. That’s why I like his blog so much. My first paragraph was very complimentary about AEH’s shooting. The 2nd accurately pointed out she has 1 assist. That is 55 shots and 1 assist. Draw whatever conclusions you want, but she ain’t Paige Bueckers..!! 😎
|
|