|
|
Post by rockymtblue2 on Mar 23, 2024 18:47:39 GMT -5
I've been thinking about that and just ran into something that could be interesting and delicious:
|
|
|
|
Post by bulkey on Mar 23, 2024 19:05:20 GMT -5
She's a public figure. She will not win a libel suit. The Post has better lawyers than she or LSU has.
|
|
|
|
Post by grrrrr on Mar 24, 2024 7:45:07 GMT -5
Too bad Clark and Mulkey aren't at the same school, they could share a box of Kleenex. Since the article hasn't come out yet, how does Mulkey even know what's in it? Obviously, she thinks it's bad. Why would she think that? Because someone knows something? Threatening the Post didn't work for Nixon, it won't for her either.
|
|
|
|
Post by RoyDodger on Mar 24, 2024 8:28:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by pinotbear on Mar 24, 2024 9:17:51 GMT -5
It's not often that you get to quote Hamlet on the WCBB thread, but,
"Methinks the lady doth protest too much"
She's deathly afraid of somethin' coming out.
|
|
|
|
Post by ursusminor on Mar 24, 2024 9:35:01 GMT -5
It's not often that you get to quote Hamlet on the WCBB thread, but, "Methinks the lady doth protest too much" She's deathly afraid of somethin' coming out.  |
|
|
|
Post by chicagogg on Mar 24, 2024 11:14:38 GMT -5
Kim just drew WAY more attention to the supposedly upcoming WAPO article than if she had kept her mouth shut.It might not have been that big a deal, but it will be now. Kim playing the victim card before the event is a bad move and a joke.
|
|
|
|
Post by UConnChapette on Mar 24, 2024 11:56:03 GMT -5
Oh, Kim. If you are reacting this strongly before the article even comes out, it must be really, really interesting and illuminating and will paint you in an even worse light than already shines on you. Then again, you can't get enough publicity. Even bad publicity. You love the spotlight on you. Can't wait to read the article.  |
|
|
|
Post by UConnChapette on Mar 24, 2024 12:24:50 GMT -5
Kim just drew WAY more attention to the supposedly upcoming WAPO article than if she had kept her mouth shut.It might not have been that big a deal, but it will be now. Kim playing the victim card before the event is a bad move and a joke. The concept of keeping her mouth shut is foreign to Kim...unless it is about Brittney Griner. Then, she stays resolutely mum. |
|
|
|
Post by rockymtblue2 on Mar 24, 2024 12:40:08 GMT -5
Too bad Clark and Mulkey aren't at the same school, they could share a box of Kleenex. Since the article hasn't come out yet, how does Mulkey even know what's in it? Obviously, she thinks it's bad. Why would she think that? Because someone knows something? Threatening the Post didn't work for Nixon, it won't for her either. She says the paper has been pestering her for 2 years, so maybe she is rightfully paranoid. |
|
|
|
Post by UConnChapette on Mar 24, 2024 13:27:20 GMT -5
Too bad Clark and Mulkey aren't at the same school, they could share a box of Kleenex. Since the article hasn't come out yet, how does Mulkey even know what's in it? Obviously, she thinks it's bad. Why would she think that? Because someone knows something? Threatening the Post didn't work for Nixon, it won't for her either. She says the paper has been pestering her for 2 years, so maybe she is rightfully paranoid. If the article will be spreading lies, shouldn’t she take the opportunity to defend herself against any falsehoods? Or does she realize she is her own worst enemy and keeping silent lets her maintain the allegations are lies? |
|
|
|
Post by pinotbear on Mar 24, 2024 13:33:11 GMT -5
Too bad Clark and Mulkey aren't at the same school, they could share a box of Kleenex. Since the article hasn't come out yet, how does Mulkey even know what's in it? Obviously, she thinks it's bad. Why would she think that? Because someone knows something? Threatening the Post didn't work for Nixon, it won't for her either. She says the paper has been pestering her for 2 years, so maybe she is rightfully paranoid. But, that's what puts a lie to her indignation about being contacted during the first week of the tourney: she admits that the writer has been trying to involve her feedback and input for, literally, years. She's had the opportunity for involvement and has refused; that's her right. She doesn't, however, have the right to censor the paper nor anyone else. Just because she doesn't want to play, she doesn't get to demand that nobody gets to play. She's either being controlling just for the hell of it, or is trying to delay, delay, delay. The question is, why? |
|
|
|
Post by rockymtblue2 on Mar 24, 2024 16:10:55 GMT -5
She says the paper has been pestering her for 2 years, so maybe she is rightfully paranoid. But, that's what puts a lie to her indignation about being contacted during the first week of the tourney: she admits that the writer has been trying to involve her feedback and input for, literally, years. She's had the opportunity for involvement and has refused; that's her right. She doesn't, however, have the right to censor the paper nor anyone else. Just because she doesn't want to play, she doesn't get to demand that nobody gets to play. She's either being controlling just for the hell of it, or is trying to delay, delay, delay. The question is, why? It's posts like this that keep me hanging around. Very cogent pinotbear. |
|
|
|
Post by linkster on Mar 24, 2024 19:32:50 GMT -5
She's a public figure. She will not win a libel suit. The Post has better lawyers than she or LSU has. If Kim had gone into acting she would have been famous for her roles as a victim. |
|
