Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2021 13:57:43 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2021 14:03:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bulkey on Oct 28, 2021 17:02:31 GMT -5
Some really strong competition there. Brink and Siegrist are both fantastic. 'Nova builds its team around Siegrist, so she will likely have the best numbers.
I don't understand Feagin. USC lists her as a guard. It's Amihere who could well have a monster year...as a power forward. Amihere, Boston, and Cardoso on the court together would be frightful, and I'm sure Dawn will try that combo out some.
|
|
|
|
Post by swash on Oct 28, 2021 17:15:38 GMT -5
Some really strong competition there. Brink and Siegrist are both fantastic. 'Nova builds its team around Siegrist, so she will likely have the best numbers. I don't understand Feagin. USC lists her as a guard. It's Amihere who could well have a monster year...as a power forward. Amihere, Boston, and Cardoso on the court together would be frightful, and I'm sure Dawn will try that combo out some. This award is NaLyssa Smith's to lose. She will not only continue to be outstanding, but Baylor is built around her with most of the turnover at the guard slots perhaps yielding more assists. Others are strong, of course ... thus their addition to this list. As for Amihere ... I think she's going to be seeing less minutes with Cardozo aboard. Her highs were exceptional, but her consistency was terrible. She'll have to rectify that or gather a lot of glute-splinters. |
|
|
|
Post by bulkey on Oct 28, 2021 17:37:11 GMT -5
Some really strong competition there. Brink and Siegrist are both fantastic. 'Nova builds its team around Siegrist, so she will likely have the best numbers. I don't understand Feagin. USC lists her as a guard. It's Amihere who could well have a monster year...as a power forward. Amihere, Boston, and Cardoso on the court together would be frightful, and I'm sure Dawn will try that combo out some. This award is NaLyssa Smith's to lose. She will not only continue to be outstanding, but Baylor is built around her with most of the turnover at the guard slots perhaps yielding more assists. Others are strong, of course ... thus their addition to this list. As for Amihere ... I think she's going to be seeing less minutes with Cardozo aboard. Her highs were exceptional, but her consistency was terrible. She'll have to rectify that or gather a lot of glute-splinters. Amihere is in much better condition this year. Like Boston, she's been challenged by Cardozo's presence. I'm thinking Boston and Cardozo are likely to alternate mostly, being in the game together maybe 15 minutes, and that Amihere will get lots of minutes. I'm sure you're right about Smith: my bad on that. |
|
|
|
Post by bulkey on Oct 28, 2021 17:37:25 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2021 18:32:04 GMT -5
Some really strong competition there. Brink and Siegrist are both fantastic. 'Nova builds its team around Siegrist, so she will likely have the best numbers. I don't understand Feagin. USC lists her as a guard. It's Amihere who could well have a monster year...as a power forward. Amihere, Boston, and Cardoso on the court together would be frightful, and I'm sure Dawn will try that combo out some. Naz Hillmon from Michigan is also very talented!! |
|
|
|
Post by UConnChapette on Oct 28, 2021 18:36:36 GMT -5
Oh look! ND and TN each got a player nominated! There must be rejoicing in the lands of orange and green. Why am I now thinking about Oompa Loompas?
|
|
|
|
Post by swash on Oct 28, 2021 19:30:49 GMT -5
Some really strong competition there. Brink and Siegrist are both fantastic. 'Nova builds its team around Siegrist, so she will likely have the best numbers. I don't understand Feagin. USC lists her as a guard. It's Amihere who could well have a monster year...as a power forward. Amihere, Boston, and Cardoso on the court together would be frightful, and I'm sure Dawn will try that combo out some. Naz Hillmon from Michigan is also very talented!! Very true. I would put her next in the line of probability list. |
|
