sTu
Husky Puppy

Posts: 221
|
Post by sTu on Oct 11, 2015 22:37:56 GMT -5
I am beginning to think that the powers that be may waver in their up to now reliability of favoring veterans.
Whalen may be injured, yet her mobility seems impaired and she is reluctant to shoot the ball, especially from behind the arc. Simone is a shadow of the talent she once was and it does not help that her shot is erratic. With the influx of post talent (Stewart and DelleDonne) I wonder if what Fowles adds to the team is diminished by what the younger players add to the team. Catchings may or may not choose to play. That may leave four openings (a third of the team) for younger players.
For the future, there is a strong need to identify guards for continuity. This is likely to be Bird's last Olympics, Whalen's also ( if she makes the team in 2016), and possibly Taurasi. I wonder how much Staley and Rizzotti's thoughts will influence those decisions by the committee. It is going to be interesting to see who backs up Bird in 2016. Next years' WNBA season in the backcourt is going to be closely watched.
|
|
|
Post by linkster on Oct 11, 2015 23:25:43 GMT -5
I agree that 2016 may be the olympic swan song for Bird, Whalen, Taurasi, Augustus & certainly Catchings. But there is plenty of time to work in younger talent after next summer's games. I expect to see several young guards get invited to the tryouts next spring and that should give us an idea of who is willing to put in the time. What I like about the USA system is that they want players who get involved early and not those who want to just show up for the olympics.
I only hope that the next head coach follows Geno's philosophy of team goals being all that matters.
|
|
|
Post by rockymtblue2 on Oct 11, 2015 23:57:36 GMT -5
I am beginning to think that the powers that be may waver in their up to now reliability of favoring veterans. Whalen may be injured, yet her mobility seems impaired and she is reluctant to shoot the ball, especially from behind the arc. Simone is a shadow of the talent she once was and it does not help that her shot is erratic. With the influx of post talent (Stewart and DelleDonne) I wonder if what Fowles adds to the team is diminished by what the younger players add to the team. Catchings may or may not choose to play. That may leave four openings (a third of the team) for younger players. For the future, there is a strong need to identify guards for continuity. This is likely to be Bird's last Olympics, Whalen's also ( if she makes the team in 2016), and possibly Taurasi. I wonder how much Staley and Rizzotti's thoughts will influence those decisions by the committee. It is going to be interesting to see who backs up Bird in 2016. Next years' WNBA season in the backcourt is going to be closely watched. For sure you have hit the mark about this time being at best the last time for some of the best. AND certainly the back court is where most attention has to be paid. The premium on the guards has to do with the structure of WBB in the talent laden USA. We have no year round national team because we have the ho hum WNBA and the world at the feet of our major talents for the rest of the year. So the guards who play for the USA I'tional Team have to be supreme players of a free flowing, make it up on the fly, we've only played together for 21 days game. So, yeah, you're damn right that the most important job is bringing on the guards of the future. Thank God you and I understand that sTu! There is hope.
|
|